This post is about the politicization of death, something that happened
often in the Civil War. Today, when we say farewell to someone who was killed
in battle, we often try to contextualize their sacrifice in terms of the cause
for which they fought; however, rarely do we emphasize their partisan
allegiance—whether they are Republicans or Democrats—and what that meant to the
cause. That is to say, at their funeral, we never say anything like,
“Lieutenant So-and-so was a Democrat and he hated this unjust war.” A scene
like that would be hard to fathom. But in the Civil War, political allegiance
meant a great deal to the traditional rites of death. In this tale, we’ll see
how a New York officer’s death became sentimentalized in Democratic lore, and
how it bore terrible consequences for a Republican officer in the same
regiment.
Our story begins with death, with an officer killed in battle. It
happened at Second Bull Run, on the afternoon of August 30, 1862, when Confederate
forces blunted an attack delivered Brigadier General John P. Hatch’s division.
One of Hatch’s regiments, the 22nd New York Volunteers, lost
forty-five officers and men killed and mortally wounded. Lieutenant Colonel Gorton
Tallman Thomas, Sr., was the highest-ranking of that regiment’s losses.
Here’s how he died. At 2:30 P.M., Thomas led the 22nd New York
forward against the unfinished railroad cut defended by Stonewall Jackson’s
corps. As the regiment closed upon the enemy line, a Confederate officer called
for the regiment to halt, hoping to trick the New Yorkers into surrendering.
Mounted behind the regimental colors, Lieutenant Colonel Thomas called for a
halt, and soon realized that his regiment was among the Confederates. A
Confederate officer demanded his regiment’s identity, and Thomas called back,
“22nd New York!” A stern mandate arrived from the smoky railroad cut
in front of the line: “Surrender, 22nd New York!” Thomas called
back, “No! Never!” and with that, the fight was on.
Thomas received a wound in the first volley. A Confederate musket ball ripped
through his arm and then pierced his ribs, cracking one of them. Thomas
attempted to remain on the field, but his wound prevented him from controlling
his horse. After twenty minutes, he retired from the field, leaving command of
the regiment to his senior captain. His panicked horse galloped into the ranks
of a nearby regiment, the 2nd U.S. Sharpshooters. Two men from that
regiment caught Thomas as he fell from his mount and carried him to a log hut
along the Warrenton Turnpike, where Thomas told them to leave him behind. Eventually,
a few soldiers from his regiment, now swept up in the massive retreat, found
their beleaguered commander. Sergeant Gorton T. Thomas, Jr., of Company C, the
lieutenant colonel’s son, was among them. They watched as the life of their
commander slowly ebbed away. Luckily, one of the New Yorkers stopped an
ambulance, and they loaded Lieutenant Colonel Thomas onto it. He endured a
rough ride, his wound bleeding along the way. Amazingly, Thomas remained
optimistic, telling the other occupants that he was okay; he had stout ribs. In
fact, the wound was worse than he believed. The ball had coursed through his
lungs and was still lodged inside him.
At a Washington hospital, Thomas slipped into a coma. At 2 o’clock in
the morning, September 3, his eyes closed and he never woke up. He remained
comatose until 8 o’clock when surgeons pronounced him dead. He left behind a
wife and nine children.
Three days after that, September 10, Lieutenant Colonel Thomas’s casket
arrived in Keeseville, New York, his hometown, where a large assortment of
mourners gathered to say farewell. A local politician, W. C. Watson, delivered
the eulogy. Typically sentimental, Watson spoke of the sacrifices of Thomas and
the community’s need to honor him by continuing the war to a victorious
conclusion:
While we contemplate
these spectacles of blood and anguish shall our hearts tremble? Shall we in
craven spirit, shrink from a glorious cause sanctified by sacrifices like
these? Let this scene rather inspire our enthusiasm and nerve our arms. Let us
here, as at a holy shrine, upon the blood of this martyred patriot, slaughtered
by this fell Rebellion, renew our vows of patriotism, and afresh dedicate our
blood and treasures, to the claims of the Union and Constitution.
But more than that, Watson helped politicize Thomas’s death. It was
September, just two months before the pivotal elections in New York. The
Democratic Party was mounting a comeback with its gubernatorial candidate,
Horatio Seymour, and Watson wanted to make it known that Thomas was a member of
Seymour’s party. Watson pointed out, “In his political relations, Colonel
Thomas was attached to that party, which has been upbraided (with what justice
I may not now discuss) for its extreme and jealous devotion to the
constitutional rights of the South.” Providing evidence in the form of personal
letters that Thomas had written to him, Watson went on to confirm that Thomas
was a War Democrat, and although he had defended the South before the war, he
was eager to destroy the Confederate rebellion, which he saw as a threat to the
U.S. Constitution. Watson went on at great length to explain how Thomas
exemplified the best spirit of the War Democrats. Thomas defended southern
Democrats in peace, but he stopped short when they proposed secession. Watson
explained:
However just and
magnanimous it might have been in a northern politician to assert and defend
the immunities of our brethren of the south from our laws and government,
neither that act or any other obligation required or justified him in the
following them in their career of madness, out of the Constitution, or to aid
or sanction their insane assaults upon our national existence. Every instinct
of patriotism revolts at a conception so unconstitutional and mistaken. The
influence of early party sympathies veil from the keen mental vision of Thomas
the hideous features of the hydra monster, that sprung from the stagnant fens
of Southern oligarchy and from the polluting machinations of a pestilent school
of southern politicians. He cherished a name of attachment to his former
political associates, but he loved far more his country, and above all earthly
hopes and affections he loved, I believe, the union of our land. A
States-rights man from principle and on conviction, he could discern no
semblance to the lineaments or proportions of those opinions in the perverted
and distorted doctrines of secession. His clear judgment could not be deceived
by the sophistical subtleties, which attempted to impose a ruthless and
detestable heresy, as the legitimate offspring of a just principle; and much less
could his vigorous understanding and vigilant patriotism be beguiled by the
transparent and frivolous fallacy, which was shamelessly announced, that
although secession was unconstitutional, the government of the Union possessed
no power to reclaim by coercion a rebellious member. Thomas could detect in
this rebellion, no redeeming element of truth or justice, no sanctity of honor
or right, and no sanction from earth or Heaven. He could only recognize in it,
the culmination of a dark and traitorous scheme, which had been maturing and
festering for more than a quarter of a century, and which now unfolded itself,
shrouded in the blackest guilt, the most debasing frauds and the deepest
treason. Traitors to their country, these men had been equally treacherous to
the party which had confided in them; which for long years had been their
defender and supporter and had sacrificed political ascendancy by the
maintenance of southern pretensions.
It’s odd to see a eulogizer go on so for so long about the political
allegiance of an officer killed in the line of duty, but there is no doubt that Democratic operatives in New York considered it a high stakes game, one that Watson needed to play. They
had to use every means at their disposal to win the election, and to them,
Thomas’s funeral was fair game.
Neither was this rhetoric entirely harmless. In fact, it had immediate
consequences for a Republican officer in Thomas’s regiment, Colonel Walter
Phelps, Jr., the 22nd New York’s senior officer. Phelps had gone on
authorized leave in late August and as a consequence, he missed the Battle of
Second Bull Run. Probably, he should have been present, but fate intervened. He
left his hometown of Glen Falls, New York, on August 25, and expected to reach
the front on August 29, three days before his leave was set to expire. Phelps
reached Washington on August 28, but he discovered that all transportation into
Fairfax County had been halted by an order from Brigadier General James
Wadsworth (who was, coincidentally, the Republican candidate for New York’s gubernatorial
election). While in Washington, Phelps received a note from Maj. Gen. Rufus
King, telling him that Lieutenant Colonel Thomas had died and that he should
make arrangements to send the body home. Phelps did not do any favors to
Thomas’s friends by ignoring King’s suggestion. Phelps wrote, “Lt. Col. Thomas
had several relations and many friends in town, [so] I left the matter in their
hands, and started for the regiment Wednesday morning.”
The news of Phelps’s absence at the battle where Thomas died soon made
its way back home to upstate New York, and the Democratic newspapers began
railing on Phelps, calling him a shirker. His wife, Eliza, wrote to tell him
about it, and when Phelps received the news, he expressed himself deeply shocked that
anyone would consider him a coward. “I will not attempt to tell you how unpleasantly
your letter made me feel,” he wrote back to Eliza, “it has embittered [my] every
moment since its receipt. . . . I have done my duty and that I used every
exertion to join my regiment.” Furious that he was getting censured by the
Democratic Press who sought to make Thomas into a hero at his expense, Phelps
began collecting all available documents to prove that he had not overstayed
his leave, that his delay in reaching the front came from a general’s order.
Colonel Phelps wrote to Eliza:
The full explanation
I have given above will satisfy my friends. I rely upon the other documents to
satisfy my enemies. It is unfortunate that I went home at all, although it has
proved of great benefit to me; but I am very sensitive on some points, and when
my courage is called in question and my motives and actions misrepresented,
particularly in this cause in which I have experienced so much pride, and in
which I have always possessed a fixed determination to distinguish myself, I am
affected more unpleasantly than one not as intimately acquainted with me as you
are, would suppose.
The rumors that circulated among the Democratic press hurt Colonel
Phelps deeply. Most tellingly, he wished that he was in Thomas’s place, that he
was the martyred hero. He hated being a living officer, one falsely accused of
cowardice. He explained:
I think I would let
my bones rot rather than leave the regiment again and go among those I have
considered my friends, under any circumstances whatever. . . . I have been
terribly, wrongly abused. I have given my life to the cause; and I have been so
proud of my regiment, its reputation was as dear to me as my own life, and an
insinuation that I would desert it is more than I can bear. I tell you, Eliza,
I will never forgive to my dying day those who have whispered ought against my
name in connection with my regiment. Their foul aspersions rankle deeply in my
breast. I would ten thousand times rather be in Lt. Col. Thomas’ place than
be suspected of cowardice or dishonarable intentions towards my regiment.
Eliza Phelps tried to rectify her husband’s dilemma by submitting his
letter and copies of the documents he sent home to a sympathetic newspaper, the
Glen Falls Republican. However, I
doubt it helped. Colonel Phelps knew that the politicization of Thomas’s death
had dealt him an unfair hand. Only through battle (which was just one week
away) could he prove his courage to doubters.
Ultimately, the burial of Lieutenant Colonel Gorton T. Thomas was a
case of death casting a vicious shadow over the living.
This is Colonel Walter Phelps, Jr., age 30, commander of the 22nd New York. |
GTThomas was an ancestor of mine (GGGGrandfather).I have visited his grave and am very interested in him and his family as well as this period of the war. This story is fascinating: could you share its source? Thanks.
ReplyDeleteSure. The lengthy description of his death comes from a eulogium published a few weeks after his death. It's easily accessible online: https://archive.org/details/eulogiumcommemor1862wats
ReplyDeleteI hope it helps.